Maj. Hamza Al-Mustapha was on Friday released from the Kirikiri Maximum Prisons, Lagos, following his discharge and acquittal of a murder charge by the Court of Appeal .
The appellate court sitting in Lagos upturned a death sentence earlier passed on Al-Mustapha and Alhaji Lateef Sofolahan, an aide to the late Kudirat Abiola.
Major Hamza Al-Mustapha leaving the Court in Lagos on Tuesday (9/8/11).
Al-Mustapha, a former Chief Security Officer (CSO) to the late Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha, was sentenced to death on Jan. 30, over the alleged murder of the Kudirat, on June 4, 1996 in Lagos.
Kudirat was wife of the late business mogul and politician, Chief M.K.O. Abiola.
Al-Mustapha, who waved to well wishers that besieged the prison, said: “thank God, thank God,’’ as he was rushed into a jeep, which drove him away.
The former CSO was driven off in the same vehicle with Shofolahan.
Shofolahan had emerged five minutes ahead of Al-Mustapha, into the warm embrace of friends, who were also full of joy.
In a joyful mood, Sofolahan told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN): “we are fine, we feel happy.’’
NAN reports that there was tight security as both men were released from prison.
Anxious family members and friends of Al-Mustapha and Shofolahan had earlier besieged the gates of the prisons ahead of their release.
The duo had been in detention since 1999 when they were charged to court. Al-Mustapha’s younger brother, Hadi, told NAN that he was overwhelmed by the judgment of the court.
At the appellate court, Justice Rita Pemu, who read the lead judgment, said that the prosecution totally failed to establish the charge of conspiracy and murder against Al-Mustapha and Shofolahan.(NAN
Appeal Court frees Al-Mustapha
The Court of Appeal, sitting in Lagos, on Friday discharged and acquitted Major Hamza Al-Mustapha, who was sentenced to death over the conspiracy and murder of Alhaja Kudirat Abiola on June 4, 1996.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Justice Mojisola Dada of a Lagos High Court had on January 30, 2012, sentenced Al-Mustapha and Lateef Shofolahan to death by hanging over the murder.
Al-Mustapha was the former Chief Security Officer to the late Gen. Sani Abacha, while Shofolahan was an aide to the late Kudirat.
Justice Rita Pemu, who read the lead judgment, said that the prosecution totally failed to establish the charge of conspiracy and murder against the appellants, including Shofolahan.
She said that it was foolhardy and unreasonable for the lower court to have so swiftly convicted the appellants, when it was very evident that the prosecution had a bad case.
Pemu held that there existed huge shadows of doubt in the case of the prosecution, which ought to be resolved in favour of the appellants.
“In a criminal trial, the burden of proof is beyond reasonable doubt and this is a chain that cannot be broken.
“The prosecution listed four witnesses PW 9, 10, 11 and 12 as witnesses, which it intended to call in the trial, but never called any of them.
“PW 1 (Dr. Ore Falomo) testified before the lower court that the bullet extracted from the forehead of the deceased, was white and of a special kind, but the prosecution failed to tender the bullet as an exhibit and this is fatal to their case.
“The prosecution also called PW 4 (Investigating Police officer) who investigated the death of the deceased, but this witness was never produced for cross-examination by the defence, as he never showed up in court.
“This renders the evidence of the police officer inconclusive as it denied the defendants their right to a fair hearing, and no reasonable court can safely make a conviction on such inconclusive testimony.
“PW 2 (Sgt. Rogers) and PW 3(Mohammedd Abdul) in their confessional statements to the police said they were enjoined by the first appellant, to murder kudirat, but this statement was later retracted by them in court.
“PW 2 and PW 3, in retracting their earlier statement to the police, told the court that they were cajoled by the prosecution to indict the appellant, with a promise to give them monetary compensation.
“This is a contradiction in the testimonies of the witnesses, it raises doubt in the case of the prosecution, and it is unimaginable that the lower court did not expunge this evidence.
“For an offence like murder, I wonder why the Nigerian police did not do a proper investigation.
“Jabila, who was initially arrested as a co-defendant, was later called a prosecution witness; witnesses who ought to be called were never called, the bullet extracted was never tendered before the court.
“Once there is doubt in the case of the prosecution, as in the instant case, it must be resolved in favour of the accused, and this doubt is accordingly resolved in favour of the appellants,’’ Pemu said.
According to her, it is clear that Kudirat was shot, but the question is: who pulled the trigger?
Written by NEWSTRAWL ONLINE UPDATE
Sodiq Oyeleke is a Media, Human Resources, Project Management and Public Relations Practitioner
0 comments:
Post a Comment